How to Handle LC Discrepancies and Amendments

What to do when your letter of credit presentation is discrepant: a practical decision tree for fixing documents, requesting amendments, or seeking waivers—without losing deadline control.

BY Tijara Editorial Team· REVIEWED BY Tijara Trade Operations Team· PUBLISHED May 11, 2026· UPDATED May 11, 2026· 3 min read

Quick answer

When an LC presentation is discrepant, your two priorities are:

  1. Protect the timeline (expiry + presentation period), and
  2. Choose the cheapest compliant path (fix docs vs amendment vs waiver).

Discrepancies are usually fixable — but they become expensive when teams lose control of deadlines and versions.

Step 1: Identify the discrepancy type (document vs deadline)

Most discrepancies fall into one of these buckets:

  • Document content mismatch (names, quantities, description wording)
  • Transport document clause mismatch (BL/AWB clause doesn’t match LC)
  • Missing document (COO/insurance/inspection)
  • Deadline breach (late shipment, late presentation, expired credit)

Start by writing the discrepancy as a single sentence.

Example: “Invoice description does not match LC wording” is actionable.

Step 2: Decide the path using this decision tree

Path A — Fix the documents (best when feasible)

Use this when:

  • the document issuer can re-issue (invoice/packing list is easy; carrier documents can be harder), and
  • the fix does not break another requirement.

Controls:

  • fix the underlying line-item data (don’t patch PDFs)
  • re-issue from one source of truth

Path B — Request an amendment (best when the LC requirement is unworkable)

Use this when:

  • the LC text asks for something you cannot produce (or is commercially wrong), or
  • the deal changed and the LC must reflect the new reality.

Operational rule: treat every amendment as a new version, and re-run a full pre-check.

Related: /resources/how-to-open-letter-of-credit

Path C — Seek a waiver (best when time is short)

Use this when:

  • you can’t re-issue a document within the presentation period, but
  • the applicant/buyer is willing to accept the discrepancy.

This is risk-sensitive: you want a clear record of acceptance and you still need to follow the bank’s process.

Step 3: Never lose deadline control

Even “minor” discrepancies become losses when teams miss:

  • expiry date,
  • presentation period, or
  • latest shipment date.

Related: /resources/track-letter-of-credit-expiry

Step 4: Prevent the next discrepancy with a pre-check checklist

Use the same pre-check every time:

  1. party names/addresses match the LC exactly
  2. invoice and packing list reconcile (quantities/weights/units)
  3. BL/AWB clause is feasible with the forwarder/carrier
  4. certificates are available from the required issuer
  5. version control: one final set, not multiple edits

How Tijara helps

Tijara helps LC-driven teams keep LC versions, document sets, and deadlines attached to the same deal timeline—so discrepancies are caught early and handled with a clear trail.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Sources

  1. [1] ICC: Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600)
    International Chamber of CommerceAccessed: 2026-05-11

Related resources

Glossary terms

GET STARTED

Run your next trade deal with full visibility

Track documents, landed cost, compliance, and settlement in one operating workflow.