How to Handle LC Discrepancies and Amendments

What to do when your letter of credit presentation is discrepant: a practical decision tree for fixing documents, requesting amendments, or seeking waivers—without losing deadline control.

By Tijara Editorial TeamReviewed by Tijara Trade Operations TeamPublished: May 11, 2026Updated: May 11, 20263 min read

Quick answer

When an LC presentation is discrepant, your two priorities are:

  1. Protect the timeline (expiry + presentation period), and
  2. Choose the cheapest compliant path (fix docs vs amendment vs waiver).

Discrepancies are usually fixable — but they become expensive when teams lose control of deadlines and versions.

Step 1: Identify the discrepancy type (document vs deadline)

Most discrepancies fall into one of these buckets:

  • Document content mismatch (names, quantities, description wording)
  • Transport document clause mismatch (BL/AWB clause doesn’t match LC)
  • Missing document (COO/insurance/inspection)
  • Deadline breach (late shipment, late presentation, expired credit)

Start by writing the discrepancy as a single sentence.

Example: “Invoice description does not match LC wording” is actionable.

Step 2: Decide the path using this decision tree

Path A — Fix the documents (best when feasible)

Use this when:

  • the document issuer can re-issue (invoice/packing list is easy; carrier documents can be harder), and
  • the fix does not break another requirement.

Controls:

  • fix the underlying line-item data (don’t patch PDFs)
  • re-issue from one source of truth

Path B — Request an amendment (best when the LC requirement is unworkable)

Use this when:

  • the LC text asks for something you cannot produce (or is commercially wrong), or
  • the deal changed and the LC must reflect the new reality.

Operational rule: treat every amendment as a new version, and re-run a full pre-check.

Related: /resources/how-to-open-letter-of-credit

Path C — Seek a waiver (best when time is short)

Use this when:

  • you can’t re-issue a document within the presentation period, but
  • the applicant/buyer is willing to accept the discrepancy.

This is risk-sensitive: you want a clear record of acceptance and you still need to follow the bank’s process.

Step 3: Never lose deadline control

Even “minor” discrepancies become losses when teams miss:

  • expiry date,
  • presentation period, or
  • latest shipment date.

Related: /resources/track-letter-of-credit-expiry

Step 4: Prevent the next discrepancy with a pre-check checklist

Use the same pre-check every time:

  1. party names/addresses match the LC exactly
  2. invoice and packing list reconcile (quantities/weights/units)
  3. BL/AWB clause is feasible with the forwarder/carrier
  4. certificates are available from the required issuer
  5. version control: one final set, not multiple edits

How Tijara helps

Tijara helps LC-driven teams keep LC versions, document sets, and deadlines attached to the same deal timeline—so discrepancies are caught early and handled with a clear trail.

FAQs

Sources

  1. [1] ICC: Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600)
    International Chamber of CommerceAccessed: 2026-05-11

Related resources

Glossary terms

Run your next trade deal with full visibility

Track documents, landed cost, compliance, and settlement in one operating workflow.